Demo Mode — Explore synthetic sample findings. Demo actions never change Current Focus.
Start Journal
Want your real leak map?
Start Journal

Leak Map

Data 64 closed trades 180D 4 setups tracked
30D 90D 180D All

Observed trade behavior

Findings read directly from normalized closed trades. Setup labels are not required.

5 supported
Instrument edge · XAUUSD Observed from normalized closed trades
+$3,950 observed P&L
20 trades 15 active days
Evidence details
Comparison 44 comparison trades

Other eligible instrument values in the same account/date/currency scope.

Observed metrics 80.0% WR · PF 8.32

+$197.50 average per trade

Evidence status Supported observation

This is an observed instrument comparison and does not establish causality.

Review exact trades
Session edge · London Observed from normalized closed trades
+$6,495 observed P&L
32 trades 21 active days
Evidence details
Comparison 32 comparison trades

Other eligible session values in the same account/date/currency scope.

Observed metrics 90.6% WR · PF 22.30

+$202.97 average per trade

Evidence status Supported observation

This is an observed session comparison and does not establish causality.

Review exact trades
Session drag · Asia Observed from normalized closed trades
-$1,235 observed P&L
11 trades 8 active days
Evidence details
Comparison 53 comparison trades

Other eligible session values in the same account/date/currency scope.

Observed metrics 0.0% WR · PF 0.00

-$112.27 average per trade

Evidence status Supported observation

This is an observed session comparison and does not establish causality.

Review exact trades
View all 5 observations
Instrument drag · BTCUSDT Observed from normalized closed trades
-$975 observed P&L
9 trades 7 active days
Evidence details
Comparison 55 comparison trades

Other eligible instrument values in the same account/date/currency scope.

Observed metrics 0.0% WR · PF 0.00

-$108.33 average per trade

Evidence status Supported observation

This is an observed instrument comparison and does not establish causality.

Review exact trades
Weekday edge · Wednesday Observed from normalized closed trades
+$1,375 observed P&L
10 trades 6 active days
Evidence details
Comparison 54 comparison trades

Other eligible weekday values in the same account/date/currency scope.

Observed metrics 60.0% WR · PF 4.24

+$137.50 average per trade

Evidence status Supported observation

This is an observed weekday comparison and does not establish causality.

Review exact trades
Attention now

Breakout Retest is the first supported priority.

Breakout Retest averaged USD 29.57 worse per trade than other setups in this scope.

All accounts · 180D

Grouped from the canonical Setup identity and closed-trade evidence.

Why first: Prioritized because a same-scope control supports the observed drag and the sample is ready for a measurable recheck.

Next supported action: Test this as Current Focus

Open evidence

Ranked findings

Observed evidence, explicit limitations, and one supported next action.

Finding
Evidence
Supported action
Visual evidence
LEAK 01
Breakout Retest
Grouped from the canonical Setup identity and closed-trade evidence.

Breakout Retest averaged USD 29.57 worse per trade than other setups in this scope.

Other setup-tagged closed trades inside the same account, date, currency and evidence-cutoff scope. Open exact evidence
Test this as Current Focus Prioritized because a same-scope control supports the observed drag and the sample is ready for a measurable recheck. Test this as Current Focus
Observed vs control Observed average difference against the stated control in this exact scope.
LEAK 02
Liquidity Sweep
Grouped from the canonical Setup identity and closed-trade evidence.

Liquidity Sweep averaged USD 147.52 worse per trade than other setups in this scope.

Other setup-tagged closed trades inside the same account, date, currency and evidence-cutoff scope. Open exact evidence
Test this as Current Focus Prioritized because a same-scope control supports the observed drag and the sample is ready for a measurable recheck. Test this as Current Focus
Observed vs control Observed average difference against the stated control in this exact scope.
EDGE 01
Supply/Demand
Grouped from the canonical Setup identity and closed-trade evidence.

Strong sample, positive expectancy, and no major evidence that the edge is fading.

Open exact evidence
Protect this edge Prioritized because this is the strongest evidence-ready positive edge in the selected scope. Protect this edge
Observed net P/L Observed net P/L in this scope; not a recoverable or forecast amount.
VALIDATE 01
Trend Continuation
Grouped from the canonical Setup identity and closed-trade evidence.

There is enough signal to watch, but not enough to allocate size yet.

Limitation: The setup sample is still below six closed trades. Open exact evidence
Collect more comparable trades Kept in validation because the sample is still forming. Collect more comparable trades
Observed net P/L USD 350.00 Observed net P/L in this scope; not a recoverable or forecast amount.
Decision boundary
Leak Map recommends a supported next action. It does not create a Daily Plan or Session Command, and Current Focus adoption remains explicit.
Proof Layer
Setup Proof Board
Setup-level evidence behind the ranked read. Use the filters to inspect what is proven, restricted, or still forming.
Breakout Retest
Review execution before taking it again
System read
Evidence ready for review
This setup used to work. The latest sample says the edge weakened.
Trades
10
Win rate
40.0%
PF
3.89
Expectancy
+$154.50
Confidence
Strong confidence
10 active days captured for this setup.
Drift
Edge weakened 3 recent trades
Recent expectancy -$91.67 vs base +$260 per trade.
Context
London is the best session at +$1,425.
Long bias
Current read
Net P&L +$1,545
PF 3.89, WR 40.0%
Open setup Open trades Review losers
Liquidity Sweep
Review execution before taking it again
System read
Evidence ready for review
This setup used to work. The latest sample says the edge weakened.
Trades
9
Win rate
55.6%
PF
2.12
Expectancy
+$64.44
Confidence
Moderate confidence
9 active days captured for this setup.
Drift
Edge weakened 3 recent trades
Recent expectancy -$126.67 vs base +$160 per trade.
Context
London is the best session at +$1,100.
Long bias
Current read
Net P&L +$580
PF 2.12, WR 55.6%
Open setup Open trades Review losers
Trend Continuation
Collect 2 more trades
System read
Signal forming, keep collecting
There is enough signal to watch, but not enough to allocate size yet.
Evidence 4 / 6
Trades
4
Win rate
75.0%
PF
6.83
Expectancy
+$87.50
Confidence
Building sample
4 active days captured for this setup.
Drift
Sample too small 3 recent trades
Need a bigger sample before drift means anything.
Context
London is the best session at +$410.
Long bias
Current read
Net P&L +$350
PF 6.83, WR 75.0%
Open setup Open trades Review winners
Supply/Demand
Protect this edge
System read
Evidence ready for review
Strong sample, positive expectancy, and no major evidence that the edge is fading.
Trades
14
Win rate
100.0%
PF
999.00
Expectancy
+$288.57
Confidence
Strong confidence
14 active days captured for this setup.
Drift
Stable 4 recent trades
Recent expectancy +$291.25 vs base +$287.50 per trade.
Context
London is the best session at +$2,945.
Long bias
Current read
Net P&L +$4,040
PF 999.00, WR 100.0%
Open setup Open trades Review winners